Ranking Methodology
| 1. Mission |
| 2. Ranking Criteria and Weights |
| 3. Definitions of Ranking Criteria |
| 4. Data Sources |
| 5. List of Abbreviations |
| 6. Contact Persons |
Many students, faculties, institutions, governments
and the public in general are interested in rankings of universities for different
purposes. However, the quality or reputation of universities cannot be precisely
measured by mere numbers. It would be impossible to quantitatively evaluate
universities worldwide, because of the huge differences of universities in the
large variety of countries and the technical difficulties in obtaining internationally
comparable data.
Two years ago, we decided to establish some kind of academic ranking of universities
worldwide by evaluating their academic or research performance. After two years
of hard work, we come up with the "Academic Ranking of World Universities
- 2003". We hope the ranking will help you to compare and identify universities
worldwide by their academic or research performance.
2. Ranking Criteria and Weights
We rank universities by several indicators of academic or research performance,
including Nobel laureates, highly cited researchers, articles published in Nature
and Science, articles in Science Citation Index-expanded and Social Science
Citation Index, and academic performance per faculty.
For each indicator, the highest scoring institution is assigned a score of 100,
and other institutions are calculated as a percentage of the top score. The
distribution of data for each indicator is examined for any significant distorting
effect; standard statistical techniques are used to adjust the indicator if
necessary.
Scores for each indicator are weighted as shown below to arrive at a final overall
score for an institution. The highest scoring institution is assigned a score
of 100, and other institutions are calculated as a percentage of the top score.
The scores are then placed in descending order. An institution's rank reflects
the number of institutions that sit above it.
|
Indicator
|
Weight
|
|
|
Nobel
|
Nobel laureates in
physics, chemistry, medicine and economics |
20%
|
|
HiCi
|
Highly cited researchers
in 21 broad subject categories |
20%
|
|
N&S
|
Articles published in
Nature and Science |
20%
|
|
SCI
|
Articles in Science Citation Index-expanded
and Social Science Citation Index |
20%
|
|
Performance
per faculty |
Academic performance
per faculty |
20%
|
|
Total
|
|
100%
|
3. Definitions of Ranking Criteria
Nobel laureates. The total number of Nobel laureates in physics, chemistry,
medicine and economics between 1911 and 2002 by prize winner's affiliation.
If a prize is shared by more than one winner, each winner is assigned the reciprocal
of the number of winners. If a winner is affiliated with more than one institution,
each institution is assigned the reciprocal of the number of institutions. Different
weights are set for every ten years, the weight is 100% for laureates in 2001-2002,
90% for laureates in 1991-2000, 80% for laureates in 1981-1990, 70% for laureates
in 1971-1980, and so on, and finally 10% for laureates in 1911-1920.
Highly cited researchers. The number of highly cited researchers
in 21 broad subject categories in life sciences, medicine, physical sciences,
engineering and social sciences. These individuals are the most highly cited
within each category for the period 1981-1999.
Articles published in Nature and Science. The average number of
articles published in Nature and Science between 2000 and 2002. To distinguish
the order of author affiliation, a weight of 100% is assigned for first author
affiliation, 50% for second author affiliation, 25% for third author affiliation,
and 10% for other author affiliation. Only publications of article type are
considered.
Articles in Science Citation Index-expanded and Social Science Citation Index.
The number of articles cited in Science Citation Index-expanded and Social Science
Citation Index. Only publications of article type are considered.
Academic performance per faculty. The academic performance scores in
the above indicators divided by the number of full-time equivalent faculty.
If the number of faculty for an institution can not be obtained, the original
score is used for the institution. For ranking - 2003, the number of full-time
equivalent faculty are obtained only for institutions in USA and China.
If you could provide us statistical information on the number of faculties
of institutions in your country, we would very much appreciate.
4. Data Sources
Nobel laureates. http://www.nobel.se.
Highly cited researchers. http://www.isihighlycited.com.
Articles published in Nature and Science. http://www.isiknowledge.com.
Articles in Science Citation Index-expanded and Social Science Citation Index.
http://www.isiknowledge.com.
Number of faculty. http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/eduhome.htm
for institutions of USA. Statistics published by the Ministry of Education of
China for institutions in China.
5. List of Abbreviations
Abbreviations used in the names of institutions are as follows:
| Agr |
-
|
Agriculture |
| Chem |
-
|
Chemistry |
| China-hk |
-
|
China - Hong Kong |
| China-tw |
-
|
China-Taiwan |
| Coll |
-
|
College |
| Fed |
-
|
Federal |
| Inst |
-
|
Institute |
| Med |
-
|
Medicine |
| Natl or Nacl |
-
|
National |
| Phys |
-
|
Physics |
| Sch |
-
|
School |
| Sci |
-
|
Science |
| Tech |
-
|
Technology |
| Univ |
-
|
University |
Other abbreviations used are as follows:
| HiCi |
-
|
Highly cited researchers |
| N&S |
-
|
Nature and Science |
| SCI |
-
|
Science Citation Index-expanded and Social Science Citation Index |
6. Contact Persons
We have four persons in our research group of academic ranking of universities
in the world. The head of the group is Professor Nian Cai LIU, other three members
are Ms Li LIU, Mr. Ying CHENG and Mr. Teng Teng WAN.
If you have any comments or suggestions, please email: Ranking@sjtu.edu.cn